When casually botanizing during a walk in the woods, we tend to simplify our observations, often at the level of the genus. And justly so: there are both superficial and profound differences between, for example, oaks (genus Quercus) and pines (Pinus). Yet a more focused look shows that there is a great deal of diversity within these genera, and that this diversity is of ecological consequence in our rapidly changing world. As a Katharine H. Putnam Postdoctoral Fellow at the Arnold, I have the good fortune of executing a research program of my particular choice and design for two years. In this case, my choice is to study maples (Acer) and my design is to explore the evolutionary context and ecological consequences of their biodiversity.

Local visitors to the Arboretum’s maple collection may recognize a few familiar friends: dominant forest species like red (Acer rubrum) and sugar maple (A. saccharum); common urban trees such as silver maple (A. saccharinum) and box elder (A. negundo); and shade-tolerant understory acquaintances like the stripe-barked (A. pensylvanicum) and mountain maple (A. spicatum). These New England natives, along with three Western endemics, make up the North American maple flora: just nine species across the continent, compared, for instance, to more than 250 oak species. Yet a tour of the Arnold’s maple collection, accredited by the Plant Collections Network of the American Public Gardens Association, will quickly evince the phenomenal biodiversity of the maple genus. For this unparalleled collection contains over 500 trees representing half of the roughly 130 maple species described to date—the vast majority of which are native to East Asia. The proximity of five dozen maple species all growing in a common environment makes it possible for me to investigate the evolution and ecology of the genus.

The best estimates indicate that the modern maples split from their nearest relatives, the two-species Chinese genus of Dipteronia and, more distantly, the buckeyes (Aesculus spp.), beginning some sixty million years ago, in the middle of the Paleocene. From their origins in what is now central China, the trees that would become today’s maples had begun to explore new environments. The breakdown of land bridges between North America and Eurasia ultimately gave rise to the disjunction, or separation, of the two realms’ floras, and allowed for the development of distinctly New and Old World northern hemispheric species such as the maples.

It is reasonable to assume that closely-related species will be more similar to each other. Maples show a strong family resemblance, or what biologists call phylogenetic conservativism—the tendency of traits to be retained in relatives. For instance, all maple leaves occur in “opposite” pairs across the stem, rather than alternately as in many other flowering plants. We can ask, then, whether particular species are still quite similar to their long-lost relatives across the disjuncture between North America and the maple biodiversity hotspot in East Asia. My earliest studies indicate that this is far from the case. In the ecologically important measurement of specific leaf area (a leaf ’s area divided by its dry weight), for example, closely related relatives are no more similar to each other than would be expected by chance. This finding of an absence of phylogenetic conservativism, which keeps cropping up as I survey additional morphological and physiological traits, suggests that some other factor causes even relatively closely related maples to differ.

This hidden factor might be the celebrated and infamous force of adaptive evolution—the capacity of populations to innovate and thrive in new environments. After all, maple evolution has taken place over many extreme fluctuations in climate, the formation of the continents as we know them, and the coincidental evolution of diverse plant competitors, microbial symbionts, and animal pollinators and predators. Perhaps the New World maples have adapted in order to thrive in their current range, developing traits that differ from those of their East Asian relatives.

To assess interpretations such as this one, I am making full use of the Arnold’s maple collection, taking leaves and branches back to the lab to record a variety of measurements including drought and freezing vulnerability, leaf morphology, and wood density. My goal is to provide a clearer picture of how both family resemblance and adaptive innovation have shaped the biodiversity of the marvelous maple genus—and to use this information to predict how maples will respond to the warming and less predictable climates that will shape their fate in the millennia to come.
Originally published in Silva, Fall/Winter 2019-20. Silva is available biannually as a benefit of membership in the Friends of the Arnold Arboretum.

From “free” to “friend”…

Established in 1911 as the Bulletin of Popular Information, Arnoldia has long been a definitive forum for conversations about temperate woody plants and their landscapes. In 2022, we rolled out a new vision for the magazine as a vigorous forum for tales of plant exploration, behind-the-scenes glimpses of botanical research, and deep dives into the history of gardens, landscapes, and science. The new Arnoldia includes poetry, visual art, and literary essays, following the human imagination wherever it entangles with trees.

It takes resources to gather and nurture these new voices, and we depend on the support of our member-subscribers to make it possible. But membership means more: by becoming a member of the Arnold Arboretum, you help to keep our collection vibrant and our research and educational mission active. Through the pages of Arnoldia, you can take part in the life of this free-to-all landscape whether you live next door or an ocean away.

For more tree-entangled art, science, and writing, subscribe to Arnoldia by becoming a member of the Arnold Arboretum.